Abstract:
This paper shall concentrate on the revision attempts of the consumer acquis which are still on the European Institutions’ agenda, making an effort to highlight the final goals that these attempts aim at, as well as the quality of their (prospective) rules. In particular, the Directive on Consumer Rights has redrafted and amended four directives on consumer contracts: the present paper focuses on the main contents of the Directive, with the intent of checking whether its goals and contents achieved a sustainable level of quality and harmonisation in the light of a comparative approach. The results of this enquiry are twofold: a correct use of the comparative method not only would have avoided questionable choices, but it would also have achieved a better level of harmonization without irritating MSs.
Amato, Cristina, The Europeanisation of Contract Law and the Role of Comparative Law: The Case of the Directive on Consumer Rights (August 6, 2012). Opinio Juris in Comparatione, No. 1/2012, Paper No. 1.
Purpose
The purpose of the ISCL is to encourage the comparative study of law and legal systems and to seek affiliation with individuals and organisations with complimentary aims. We were established in June 2008 and are recognised by the International Academy of Comparative Law.
Saturday, August 11, 2012
The Comparative History and Theory of Corporate Criminal Liability
Abstract:
This paper is an exercise in comparative legal history and theory. It argues, first, that traditional views of the history of corporate criminal liability in German and Anglo-American law are interestingly mistaken, or at least incomplete, taken independently and comparatively, and, second, that histories and theories of corporate criminal liability engage in symbolic jurisprudence insofar as they treat their subject as a litmus test for other, more fundamental, phenomena, such as the relative influence of Roman and German law or the relative commitment of systems of criminal law to science, truth, and justice.
Dubber, Markus D., The Comparative History and Theory of Corporate Criminal Liability (July 10, 2012).
This paper is an exercise in comparative legal history and theory. It argues, first, that traditional views of the history of corporate criminal liability in German and Anglo-American law are interestingly mistaken, or at least incomplete, taken independently and comparatively, and, second, that histories and theories of corporate criminal liability engage in symbolic jurisprudence insofar as they treat their subject as a litmus test for other, more fundamental, phenomena, such as the relative influence of Roman and German law or the relative commitment of systems of criminal law to science, truth, and justice.
Dubber, Markus D., The Comparative History and Theory of Corporate Criminal Liability (July 10, 2012).
Essential Principles of Contract and Sales Law in the Northern Pacific: Federated States of Micronesia, the Republics of Palau and the Marshall Islands, and United States Territories
Abstract:
The Northern Pacific region, which includes Micronesia, the State of Hawaii, the American territories of Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands and American Samoa, and the Republics of Palau and the Marshall Islands, either follows or are heavily influenced by the Anglo-American common law tradition and statutes governing contract and sales. Islands in this region have made efforts to adopt recognized uniform international contract standards, particularly the Restatement (Second) of Contracts, but customary law and traditional rights still have a significant impact upon the development of contract and sales law creating a unique amalgam of substantive law in the Northern Pacific region.
The author includes a comparison to contract and sales law that is prevalent in the United States and applicable in its Northern Pacific State of Hawaii and in its Pacific territories of Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. Other U.S. territories in the Northern Pacific including Midway, Wake, Johnston Atoll, Baker, Howland and Jarvis, Palmyra, and Kingman are outside the scope of his anaylsis. The article emphasizes divergence, and highlights regional anomalies in the substantive law of contract and sales. It also examines the inter-relationship between customary and traditional law and the law of contract and sales. This anthropological approach highlights how regional custom and traditional law have interacted with Anglo-American concepts of contract and sales law to produce a unique blend of contract and sales law in this Northern Pacific region.
The author notes two significant developments; 1) that the American Law Institute’s Restatements of Law have been elevated from simply persuasive authority to the rule of decision in some of these Pacific Island nations, and 2) that the anthropological implications of local custom and traditional law in substantive contract and sales law have created a unique regional amalgam.
Ryan, Daniel P., Essential Principles of Contract and Sales Law in the Northern Pacific: Federated States of Micronesia, the Republics of Palau and the Marshall Islands, and United States Territories (January 29, 2009). Ave Maria International Law Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2009.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)